1. But really, into the family history, we knowthat for every rule there is certainly a different. An effective vexing point ofgenealogy is the fact no body really understands how to put on the newest conditions orrules having people decisive adjective such as for instance always, perhaps, most likely,likely, an such like. It could be interesting when the there other advice ofjointures are generated per year otherwise one or two after a known relationships date.
2. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards relationships out of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, once taken off the latest fifth LordClifford? That would restrict their matrimony day.
Arthur
Presumably, if a great dispensation try sought and you may granted, it might havebeen because of the one of many adopting the, and may appear in the correspondingregister book, if it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop regarding Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In case your 10th Lord Clifford really does marry during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth after for the reason that seasons, do the fresh chronology perhaps not works?
John palms?
Age produced from inside the later 1487, Henry created for the 1488/9, Joan for the ,etc. completing the newest labels of your own upload out of . If (a) thechronology nonetheless really works; and you can (b) her wedding bit wasn’t reasonable; thenwe simply have the fresh new 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s which is when you look at the oppositionto the latest supposition that she are a valid daughter.
6. About your 1505 pedigree: Is the Clifford daughters this new onlyknown Henry VII connections excluded? Have there been other people? Therefore,wouldn’t one to mirror defectively about this file while the a source?
Of evaluations You will find made of the latest c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which are
Regarding c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the Clifford children are not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but rather regarding St. John pedigree. Because I’mnot accustomed the newest St. John loved ones, pursuing the ‘s the guidance asit seems about c.1505 pedigree, because extracted from the fresh 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. blog post. The fresh phrasing inside the quotations is precisely since it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess off Somerset got three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Lady the King’s Mommy.” who had “The brand new King.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got step three daus & dos sons:
A beneficial. “Edith, wedded so you’re able to Geoffrey Rod off Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded with the Lady Margaret, dau. out of theDuke out of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[yet another youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five youngsters:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married to Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun of Shaftesbury https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/datingkultur-i-mexiko/.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however named.C2. “E, wedded so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, married earliest with the Lord Zouche; shortly after towards the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated however entitled.
Margaret Duchess away from Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, past partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”